 be an element of a commutative ring
 be an element of a commutative ring  . Then we define the
localization
. Then we define the
localization  of
 of  with respect to
 with respect to  as a ring defined by
 as a ring defined by
![$\displaystyle A_{f}=A[X]/(X f -1)
$](img39.png) 
 is a indeterminate.
 is a indeterminate. , the residue class of
, the residue class of  plays the role of the 
inverse of
 plays the role of the 
inverse of  . Therefore, we may write
. Therefore, we may write ![$A[1/f]$](img41.png) instead of
 instead of  if there is no confusion.
if there is no confusion.
One may define localization in much more general situation. The reader is advised to read standard books on commutative algebras.
 be an element of a commutative ring
 be an element of a commutative ring  .
Then there is a canonically defined homeomorphism 
between
.
Then there is a canonically defined homeomorphism 
between  and
 and 
 .
(It is usual to identify these two via this homeomorphism.)
.
(It is usual to identify these two via this homeomorphism.) be the natural homomorphism.
We have already seen that we have a continuous map
 be the natural homomorphism.
We have already seen that we have a continuous map
 
 and
 and  .
.
Let us do this by considering representations.
 corresponds to a representation
 corresponds to a representation 
 .
. 
 corresponds to a representation
 corresponds to a representation 
 .
.
 corresponds to a restriction map
 corresponds to a restriction map
 
 .
.
Now, for any 
 ,
,
 
 extends to
 extends to  if and only if the image
 if and only if the image 
 of
 of
 is invertible, that means,
 is invertible, that means, 
 .
In such a case,  the extension is unique.
(We recall the fact that the inverse of an element of 
a field is unique.)
.
In such a case,  the extension is unique.
(We recall the fact that the inverse of an element of 
a field is unique.)
It is easy to prove that 
 is a homeomorphism.
 is a homeomorphism.
  
Let  be a ring. Let
 be a ring. Let  .
It is important to note that each element of
.
It is important to note that each element of  is written as a 
“fraction”
 is written as a 
“fraction”
 
 as a set of such formal fractions 
which satisfy ordinary computation rules. 
In precise, we have the following Lemma.
 as a set of such formal fractions 
which satisfy ordinary computation rules. 
In precise, we have the following Lemma.
 be a ring,
 be a ring,  be its element.
We consider the following set
 be its element.
We consider the following set
 
 the following equivalence law.
 the following equivalence law.
 
 by introducing 
the following sum and product.
 by introducing 
the following sum and product.
 
 
 the equivalence class of
 the equivalence class of 
 .
.
Likewise, for any  -module
-module  , we may define
, we may define  as
a set of formal fractions
 as
a set of formal fractions
