Let be a commutative ring. (Recall that we always assume ring to
be unital associative.)
Amazingly enough(!?), any element in is central.
As we have seen in the Schur's Lemma, for any “finite dimensional”
irreducible representation of , should be a
scalar. Thus we see that any irreducible “finite dimensional”
irreducible representation of
should be one dimensional.
Though this argument does not make sense when has no restriction
such as “ is finitely generated over a field”,
we may begin by considering a one-dimensional representation of .
That means, a ring homomorphism
where is a field.
One knows that
-
is an integral domain. That means, it has no
zero-divisor other than zero. (In this sense,
is said to
be a prime ideal of .)
- is decomposed in the following way.
where is the field of fractions of a ring .
With a suitable definition of “equivalence" of such representations,
we may identify equivalence class of representation with
the kernel
.
In other words, we are interested in prime ideals.
DEFINITION 07.1
Let
be a commutative ring.
Then we define the set
of spectrum of
as the set of
prime ideals of
.
We note that for any
, we have a ring homomorphism
(“representation associated to
”)
defined by
Since
is an inclusion, we may say, by abuse of language,
that the value of an element under the representation
is equal to
. We note further that
holds.
Let us now define a topology on
.
DEFINITION 07.2
Let
be a commutative ring.
For any
, we define a subset
of
defined by
PROOF..
DEFINITION 07.4
The topology defined in the preceding Lemma is called the Zariski topology of
.
In Part II, we always equip
with the Zariski topology.
Thus for any commutative ring , we may always associate a topological
space
.