holds. So we have
Let us prove the opposite inclusion. We take an arbitrary element .
For any satisfying , we have and thus
The rank of the left hand side is at most . So must be equal to 0 when . Otherwise ( ), we compare the trace of the both hand sides. The trace of the left hand side is clearly zero. The trace of a scalar matrix is equal to . Thus by our assumption ( ). In either case, we have . Then we compute some of special cases. First, let us examine the case where . Then
hold. Putting the equations all together, we conclude that is in the right hand side of the lemma.
As an application of the Engel's theorem, we prove the following proposition.
If , then and hence or . Assume now . Let us consider the Lie algebra of strictly upper triangular matrices. Then
satisfies the assumption of the Engel's theorem. So there exists a non-constant element such that
holds. By using the previous lemma, we see that may be presented as
Since is non-constant, we have .
Thus belongs to . By changing the order of the base and repeating the above argument, we conclude that
In addition we have
This clearly proves . Since the codimension of in is , we have either or .
For the sake of completeness, we deal with the case . In this case, situation is a bit different.
holds. By subtracting a constant matrix, one may easily replace by a matrix with zero diagonals.
(2) By a direct computation we see
(Note that .)
(3) .
(i) Case where . In this case there exists an element with . Putting
we compute as follows
(Note .) Then we have
Thus we see that . In a same way (by changing the order of the base), we obtain, .
Since , we see that spans the . thus in this case.
(ii) Case where and . Let be arbitrary element of and put
Then by computing as in the case (i) above, we know that . Similarly, we know . Since is traceless, also holds. So the only possibility in this case is .
(iii) Case where . By a dimension consideration, we see that . Then we use the above lemma.
(iv) The case or . Excellent. There is nothing to in this case.