PROOF..
Let us denote by 

 the ideal of 

 generated by 

.
Then we define a subset 

 of 

 as follows.
Now we claim the following facts.
 is closed under addition.
 
 is stable under  multiplication by any element of  
.
 
. 
 
- 
.
 
 is closed under multiplication.
 
The only (5) may require proof. For any elements 

, we have
So the subset 
 is a 
-subalgebra of 
 containing the generators
  
 of 
. Thus we have 
.
 
 PROOF..
Let us first prove the  ``if'' part. Assume 

 is open.
then 

 is a clopen (``closed and open'') subset of 

.
Namely,
is a decomposition of the scheme 

 into two Zariski open set.
Thus we have
We then note in particular that 

 has
a distinguished global section (``the identity'') 

 defined by
Then we see that 
So we have
as required.
Let us now prove the ``only if'' part. The question is local on 
 and on 
.
So we may assume that 
 is of the form
where 

 is a finitely generated algebra over 

.
Let 

 be the ideal of definition of the diagonal.
The previous Lemma tells us that 

 
is finitely generated over 

.
By the assumption we have
Now we use the Nakayama's lemma (theorem below) to find an element 

 
such that 
Then it is easy to see that 

 is an idempotent and that 

is its range.