Next: Definition of congruent Zeta
Up: Topics in Non commutative
Previous: Guiding problems
In this section we summarize some results on field theory,
especially on finite fields.
We omit the proofs. See for example [4]
([5] if the reader prefers a Japanese book).
All the rings and fields in this section is assumed to be commutative.
The following lemma is well-known.
LEMMA 5.1
For any prime number
,
is a field.
(We denote it by
.)
Funny things about this field are:
LEMMA 5.2
Let
be a prime number.
Let
be a commutative ring which contains
as a subring.
Then:
holds in
.
- For any
, we have
We would like to show existence of ``finite fields''.
A first thing to do is to know their basic properties.
The next task is to construct such field. An important tool is
the following
LEMMA 5.4
For any field
and for any non zero polynomial
,
there exists a field
containing
such that
is decomposed into polynomials of degree
.
To prove it we use the following lemma.
LEMMA 5.7
Let
be a prime number. Let
be a positive integer.
Let
. Then:
- There exists a field which has exactly
elements.
- There exists an irreducible polynomial
of degree
over
.
-
is divisible by
.
- For any field
which has exactly
-elements, there exists an element
such that
.
THEOREM 5.8
For any power
of
, there exists a field which has exactly
elements.
It is unique up to an isomorphism. (We denote it by
.)
The relation between various
's is described in the following lemma.
LEMMA 5.9
There exists a homomorphism from
to
if and only if
is a power of
.
Note: The argument given in previous versions of this note was not
good enough - inductive limits were taken for non-cofinal arrows.
So we modified it to a corrected version(2006/11/29).
Suppose we are given a power
of a prime number
.
For each positive integer
, we put
(a field with $q^n!$ elements)
which is unique up to an isomorphism.
Then let us choose for each
a field homomorphism
Then we take an inductive limit to define
It is easy to check that the following theorem holds.
THEOREM 5.10
is the algebraic closure of
.
Thus, a fortiori the isomorphism class of the field
does not
depend of the choice of
or
.
Subsections
Next: Definition of congruent Zeta
Up: Topics in Non commutative
Previous: Guiding problems
2007-04-20